2003 Mitsubishi Outlander vs Chevrolet Tracker 4WD Hardtop — Side by Side Comparison
How does the 2003 Mitsubishi Outlander compare to the Chevrolet Tracker 4WD Hardtop? We put them side by side using EPA fuel economy data and NHTSA safety ratings.
Specifications Comparison
| Feature | Mitsubishi Outlander | Chevrolet Tracker 4WD Hardtop |
|---|---|---|
| Combined MPG | 21 | 21 |
| City MPG | 18 | 20 |
| Highway MPG | 24 | 23 |
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Drive | FWD | AWD/4WD |
| Fuel Type | Regular | Regular |
| Safety Rating | N/A / 5 | N/A / 5 |
| Recalls | 0 | 0 |
| Trims Available | 2 | 3 |
Fuel Economy
The Chevrolet Tracker 4WD Hardtop is more fuel efficient by 0 MPG combined. Over a year, the Chevrolet Tracker 4WD Hardtop saves approximately $0 in fuel costs.