2000 Mercedes-Benz E320 4Matic (Wagon) vs Ford Taurus Wagon — Side by Side Comparison
How does the 2000 Mercedes-Benz E320 4Matic (Wagon) compare to the Ford Taurus Wagon? We put them side by side using EPA fuel economy data and NHTSA safety ratings.
Specifications Comparison
| Feature | Mercedes-Benz E320 4Matic (Wagon) | Ford Taurus Wagon |
|---|---|---|
| Combined MPG | 20 | 20 |
| City MPG | 17 | 17 |
| Highway MPG | 24 | 25 |
| Body Style | Wagon | Wagon |
| Drive | AWD/4WD | FWD |
| Fuel Type | Premium | Regular |
| Safety Rating | N/A / 5 | N/A / 5 |
| Recalls | 0 | 0 |
| Trims Available | 1 | 3 |
Fuel Economy
The Ford Taurus Wagon is more fuel efficient by 0 MPG combined. Over a year, the Ford Taurus Wagon saves approximately $600 in fuel costs.