2003 Mazda Tribute vs Chevrolet Tracker 2WD Hardtop — Side by Side Comparison
How does the 2003 Mazda Tribute compare to the Chevrolet Tracker 2WD Hardtop? We put them side by side using EPA fuel economy data and NHTSA safety ratings.
Specifications Comparison
| Feature | Mazda Tribute | Chevrolet Tracker 2WD Hardtop |
|---|---|---|
| Combined MPG | 22 | 22 |
| City MPG | 20 | 20 |
| Highway MPG | 25 | 24 |
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Drive | AWD/4WD | RWD |
| Fuel Type | Regular | Regular |
| Safety Rating | N/A / 5 | N/A / 5 |
| Recalls | 0 | 0 |
| Trims Available | 4 | 3 |
Fuel Economy
The Chevrolet Tracker 2WD Hardtop is more fuel efficient by 0 MPG combined. Over a year, the Chevrolet Tracker 2WD Hardtop saves approximately $100 in fuel costs.