2013 GMC Savana 1500 2WD (Cargo) vs BMW M5 — Side by Side Comparison
How does the 2013 GMC Savana 1500 2WD (Cargo) compare to the BMW M5? We put them side by side using EPA fuel economy data and NHTSA safety ratings.
Specifications Comparison
| Feature | GMC Savana 1500 2WD (Cargo) | BMW M5 |
|---|---|---|
| Combined MPG | 17 | 17 |
| City MPG | 15 | 15 |
| Highway MPG | 20 | 22 |
| Body Style | Sedan | Sedan |
| Drive | RWD | RWD |
| Fuel Type | Regular | Premium |
| Safety Rating | N/A / 5 | N/A / 5 |
| Recalls | 0 | 0 |
| Trims Available | 2 | 2 |
Fuel Economy
The BMW M5 is more fuel efficient by 0 MPG combined. Over a year, the GMC Savana 1500 2WD (Cargo) saves approximately $850 in fuel costs.