2003 GMC Safari AWD Conversion (Cargo) vs Chevrolet Astro AWD (Cargo) Conversion — Side by Side Comparison
How does the 2003 GMC Safari AWD Conversion (Cargo) compare to the Chevrolet Astro AWD (Cargo) Conversion? We put them side by side using EPA fuel economy data and NHTSA safety ratings.
Specifications Comparison
| Feature | GMC Safari AWD Conversion (Cargo) | Chevrolet Astro AWD (Cargo) Conversion |
|---|---|---|
| Combined MPG | 14 | 14 |
| City MPG | 12 | 12 |
| Highway MPG | 16 | 16 |
| Body Style | Sedan | Sedan |
| Drive | AWD/4WD | AWD/4WD |
| Fuel Type | Regular | Regular |
| Safety Rating | N/A / 5 | N/A / 5 |
| Recalls | 0 | 0 |
| Trims Available | 1 | 1 |
Fuel Economy
The Chevrolet Astro AWD (Cargo) Conversion is more fuel efficient by 0 MPG combined. Over a year, the Chevrolet Astro AWD (Cargo) Conversion saves approximately $0 in fuel costs.