2016 Ford F150 3.5L 4WD Gvwr>7599 Lbs Payload Package vs Toyota Tundra — Side by Side Comparison
How does the 2016 Ford F150 3.5L 4WD Gvwr>7599 Lbs Payload Package compare to the Toyota Tundra? We put them side by side using EPA fuel economy data and NHTSA safety ratings.
Specifications Comparison
| Feature | Ford F150 3.5L 4WD Gvwr>7599 Lbs Payload Package | Toyota Tundra |
|---|---|---|
| Combined MPG | 17 | 17 |
| City MPG | 15 | 15 |
| Highway MPG | 20 | 19 |
| Body Style | Truck | Truck |
| Drive | 4WD | RWD |
| Fuel Type | Regular | Regular |
| Safety Rating | N/A / 5 | N/A / 5 |
| Recalls | 0 | 0 |
| Trims Available | 1 | 4 |
Fuel Economy
The Toyota Tundra is more fuel efficient by 0 MPG combined. Over a year, the Ford F150 3.5L 4WD Gvwr>7599 Lbs Payload Package saves approximately $350 in fuel costs.