2003 Ford E250 Econoline vs Chevrolet Astro AWD (Cargo) Conversion — Side by Side Comparison
How does the 2003 Ford E250 Econoline compare to the Chevrolet Astro AWD (Cargo) Conversion? We put them side by side using EPA fuel economy data and NHTSA safety ratings.
Specifications Comparison
| Feature | Ford E250 Econoline | Chevrolet Astro AWD (Cargo) Conversion |
|---|---|---|
| Combined MPG | 14 | 14 |
| City MPG | 12 | 12 |
| Highway MPG | 17 | 16 |
| Body Style | Sedan | Sedan |
| Drive | RWD | AWD/4WD |
| Fuel Type | Regular | Regular |
| Safety Rating | N/A / 5 | N/A / 5 |
| Recalls | 0 | 0 |
| Trims Available | 3 | 1 |
Fuel Economy
The Chevrolet Astro AWD (Cargo) Conversion is more fuel efficient by 0 MPG combined. Over a year, the Chevrolet Astro AWD (Cargo) Conversion saves approximately $0 in fuel costs.