2004 Chevrolet Tracker 4WD Hardtop vs BMW X3 — Side by Side Comparison
How does the 2004 Chevrolet Tracker 4WD Hardtop compare to the BMW X3? We put them side by side using EPA fuel economy data and NHTSA safety ratings.
Specifications Comparison
| Feature | Chevrolet Tracker 4WD Hardtop | BMW X3 |
|---|---|---|
| Combined MPG | 18 | 18 |
| City MPG | 17 | 15 |
| Highway MPG | 20 | 23 |
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Drive | AWD/4WD | AWD/4WD |
| Fuel Type | Regular | Premium |
| Safety Rating | N/A / 5 | N/A / 5 |
| Recalls | 0 | 0 |
| Trims Available | 1 | 4 |
Fuel Economy
The BMW X3 is more fuel efficient by 0 MPG combined. Over a year, the Chevrolet Tracker 4WD Hardtop saves approximately $800 in fuel costs.