2004 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (Cargo) Conversion vs Ford E150 Econoline — Side by Side Comparison
How does the 2004 Chevrolet Astro 2WD (Cargo) Conversion compare to the Ford E150 Econoline? We put them side by side using EPA fuel economy data and NHTSA safety ratings.
Specifications Comparison
| Feature | Chevrolet Astro 2WD (Cargo) Conversion | Ford E150 Econoline |
|---|---|---|
| Combined MPG | 15 | 15 |
| City MPG | 14 | 13 |
| Highway MPG | 18 | 18 |
| Body Style | Sedan | Sedan |
| Drive | RWD | RWD |
| Fuel Type | Regular | Regular |
| Safety Rating | N/A / 5 | N/A / 5 |
| Recalls | 0 | 0 |
| Trims Available | 1 | 2 |
Fuel Economy
The Ford E150 Econoline is more fuel efficient by 0 MPG combined. Over a year, the Ford E150 Econoline saves approximately $0 in fuel costs.