2004 BMW X3 vs Chevrolet Tracker 2WD Hardtop — Side by Side Comparison
How does the 2004 BMW X3 compare to the Chevrolet Tracker 2WD Hardtop? We put them side by side using EPA fuel economy data and NHTSA safety ratings.
Specifications Comparison
| Feature | BMW X3 | Chevrolet Tracker 2WD Hardtop |
|---|---|---|
| Combined MPG | 18 | 18 |
| City MPG | 15 | 17 |
| Highway MPG | 23 | 20 |
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Drive | AWD/4WD | RWD |
| Fuel Type | Premium | Regular |
| Safety Rating | N/A / 5 | N/A / 5 |
| Recalls | 0 | 0 |
| Trims Available | 4 | 1 |
Fuel Economy
The Chevrolet Tracker 2WD Hardtop is more fuel efficient by 0 MPG combined. Over a year, the Chevrolet Tracker 2WD Hardtop saves approximately $800 in fuel costs.